You cannot select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.

Alan Coopersmith e538601128 int10: wrap entire V_ADDR_R* macros in parens for safer expansion ... Resolves warnings from Oracle Parfait static analyser: Error: Misleading macro Misleading macro [misleading-macro]: misleading evaluation of ternary '?:' operator in expansion of macro V_ADDR_RB due to missing parentheses at line 392 of hw/xfree86/int10/generic.c. '|' operator has higher precedence than ternary '?:' operator inside macro body at line 431 low precedence ternary '?:' operator is hidden by expansion of macro V_ADDR_RB at line 431 Misleading macro [misleading-macro]: misleading evaluation of ternary '?:' operator in expansion of macro V_ADDR_RB due to missing parentheses at line 392 of hw/xfree86/int10/generic.c. '<<' operator has higher precedence than ternary '?:' operator inside macro body at line 431 low precedence ternary '?:' operator is hidden by expansion of macro V_ADDR_RB at line 431 Misleading macro [misleading-macro]: misleading evaluation of ternary '?:' operator in expansion of macro V_ADDR_RB due to missing parentheses at line 392 of hw/xfree86/int10/generic.c. '<<' operator has higher precedence than ternary '?:' operator inside macro body at line 442 low precedence ternary '?:' operator is hidden by expansion of macro V_ADDR_RB at line 442 Misleading macro [misleading-macro]: misleading evaluation of ternary '?:' operator in expansion of macro V_ADDR_RB due to missing parentheses at line 392 of hw/xfree86/int10/generic.c. '<<' operator has higher precedence than ternary '?:' operator inside macro body at line 443 low precedence ternary '?:' operator is hidden by expansion of macro V_ADDR_RB at line 443 Misleading macro [misleading-macro]: misleading evaluation of ternary '?:' operator in expansion of macro V_ADDR_RB due to missing parentheses at line 392 of hw/xfree86/int10/generic.c. '|' operator has higher precedence than ternary '?:' operator inside macro body at line 443 low precedence ternary '?:' operator is hidden by expansion of macro V_ADDR_RB at line 441 Misleading macro [misleading-macro]: misleading evaluation of ternary '?:' operator in expansion of macro V_ADDR_RB due to missing parentheses at line 392 of hw/xfree86/int10/generic.c. '<<' operator has higher precedence than ternary '?:' operator inside macro body at line 443 low precedence ternary '?:' operator is hidden by expansion of macro V_ADDR_RB at line 443 Signed-off-by: Alan Coopersmith <alan.coopersmith@oracle.com>		4 years ago
..
INT10.HOWTO	Fix spelling/wording issues	4 years ago
Makefile.am	xfree86: Merge vbe into int10	5 years ago
generic.c	int10: wrap entire V_ADDR_R* macros in parens for safer expansion	4 years ago
helper_exec.c	Fix spelling/wording issues	4 years ago
helper_mem.c	Replace 'pointer' type with 'void *'	11 years ago
meson.build	xfree86: Merge vbe into int10	5 years ago
stub.c	int10: fix build error	11 years ago
vbe.c	Fix spelling/wording issues	4 years ago
vbe.h	Fix spelling/wording issues	4 years ago
vbeModes.c	Fix spelling/wording issues	4 years ago
vbeModes.h	xfree86: Merge vbe into int10	5 years ago
x86emu.c	Remove libcwrapper usage from xorg server modules. The libcwrapper is only	19 years ago
xf86int10.c	Fix spelling/wording issues	4 years ago
xf86int10.h	Replace 'pointer' type with 'void *'	11 years ago
xf86int10module.c	Introduce a consistent coding style	13 years ago
xf86x86emu.c	x86emu: Change include order to avoid conflict with system header	9 years ago
xf86x86emu.h	Remove RCS tags. Fix Xprint makefile braindamage.	19 years ago